<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The vision for government corporate websites in the Single Domain (with product wireframes)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/</link>
	<description>Putting the public first in delivering digital public services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A quick tour of Inside Government &#124; Government Digital Service</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-15373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A quick tour of Inside Government &#124; Government Digital Service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-15373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The vision for corporate websites in the single domain (with early wireframes) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The vision for corporate websites in the single domain (with early wireframes) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond the publishing machine &#124; Digital Health</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-8611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beyond the publishing machine &#124; Digital Health]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-8611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] work on the corporate beta has (so far) focussed on the publishing machine &#8211; those things that all government department [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] work on the corporate beta has (so far) focussed on the publishing machine &#8211; those things that all government department [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introducing the beta of GOV.UK &#124; Government Digital Service</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Introducing the beta of GOV.UK &#124; Government Digital Service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that we haven’t dealt with yet. Content which explains what each Government department does is coming soon in the second phase of the beta (we use the term ‘corporate’ as a shorthand for this). And information of special interest to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that we haven’t dealt with yet. Content which explains what each Government department does is coming soon in the second phase of the beta (we use the term ‘corporate’ as a shorthand for this). And information of special interest to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UX by iancremona - Pearltrees</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UX by iancremona - Pearltrees]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-2345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The vision for government corporate websites in the Single Domain (with product wireframes) &#124; Govern...  All that aside, these drawings remain the most useful thing to share at this point to give you a sense of where we are heading. The product we release in beta, which will run in parallel alongside departments’ existing sites in early 2012, will be recognisably 80% of the way towards delivering this vision – and, where it deviates, we should have interesting stories to tell about how our thinking and priorities evolved along the way. More importantly, I want to put these out there to get your feedback now. I’ve workshopped them a bit with various domain experts inside and outside government, but the more feedback – from end users in particular – the better. Bring it on! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The vision for government corporate websites in the Single Domain (with product wireframes) | Govern&#8230;  All that aside, these drawings remain the most useful thing to share at this point to give you a sense of where we are heading. The product we release in beta, which will run in parallel alongside departments’ existing sites in early 2012, will be recognisably 80% of the way towards delivering this vision – and, where it deviates, we should have interesting stories to tell about how our thinking and priorities evolved along the way. More importantly, I want to put these out there to get your feedback now. I’ve workshopped them a bit with various domain experts inside and outside government, but the more feedback – from end users in particular – the better. Bring it on! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiHerd</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SiHerd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-2176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great to see. It feels like you&#039;ve not overlooked the detail in putting this together (eg Related (primary and secondary) links in the content area are really useful for those directly entering the site from search. Did you think at all about making the site search field more prominent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see. It feels like you&#8217;ve not overlooked the detail in putting this together (eg Related (primary and secondary) links in the content area are really useful for those directly entering the site from search. Did you think at all about making the site search field more prominent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doris Gray</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doris Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-1841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have thought bis.co.uk is fit for purpose - what&#039;s to be gained from giving it a generic look and feel in common with the other departmental websites? 

On the other hand, BIS need to be punished for making us converge our websites on to Directgov.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought bis.co.uk is fit for purpose &#8211; what&#8217;s to be gained from giving it a generic look and feel in common with the other departmental websites? </p>
<p>On the other hand, BIS need to be punished for making us converge our websites on to Directgov.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fox (@x333xxx)</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fox (@x333xxx)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-1776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a concept I believe these wireframes are just about on the money, following a theme and structure that I had already envisaged myself. 

I wonder whether other tiers of government (unitary/county/district plus parish and town councils) will be encouraged to adopt a &quot;GovUK&quot; site &#039;wrap&#039; so that all tiers are visibly of the same Government &quot;family&quot;? 

Whilst it would be inappropriate to mandate a site design at local and parish government level (for one thing doing so would meet very stiff opposition from localgovweb parties), a consistent approach to central government content would enhance user experience and usage of the single domain, whilst helping the citizen to understand the differences and responsibilities of the different tiers. 

Different treatments on local council websites currently offer a mixed bag of means of access from local to central government, all dependent on the visibility (profile) accorded by a site&#039;s manager. This could be remedied at a stroke by mandating a &#039;single domain wrap&#039; with permanent navigation links embedded, perhaps with variants permitted for the devolved administration. 

(Note: The views expressed here are my personal observations)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a concept I believe these wireframes are just about on the money, following a theme and structure that I had already envisaged myself. </p>
<p>I wonder whether other tiers of government (unitary/county/district plus parish and town councils) will be encouraged to adopt a &#8220;GovUK&#8221; site &#8216;wrap&#8217; so that all tiers are visibly of the same Government &#8220;family&#8221;? </p>
<p>Whilst it would be inappropriate to mandate a site design at local and parish government level (for one thing doing so would meet very stiff opposition from localgovweb parties), a consistent approach to central government content would enhance user experience and usage of the single domain, whilst helping the citizen to understand the differences and responsibilities of the different tiers. </p>
<p>Different treatments on local council websites currently offer a mixed bag of means of access from local to central government, all dependent on the visibility (profile) accorded by a site&#8217;s manager. This could be remedied at a stroke by mandating a &#8216;single domain wrap&#8217; with permanent navigation links embedded, perhaps with variants permitted for the devolved administration. </p>
<p>(Note: The views expressed here are my personal observations)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Williams</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much appreciated, both.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much appreciated, both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Navarra (@MattNavarraUK)</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Navarra (@MattNavarraUK)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neil 

As always, i am here ready/willing and keen to be invovled as this sort of stuff is of great interest to me.  Not sure what help you need right now.  Let me know?  

Matt

PS - site is looking slick!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil </p>
<p>As always, i am here ready/willing and keen to be invovled as this sort of stuff is of great interest to me.  Not sure what help you need right now.  Let me know?  </p>
<p>Matt</p>
<p>PS &#8211; site is looking slick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Andrews</title>
		<link>http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011/10/27/the-vision-for-government-corporate-websites-in-the-single-domain-with-product-wireframes/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/?p=1848#comment-1623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking as the guy largely responsible for the current DCMS website - having looked at your wireframes I won&#039;t mourn my baby one bit once it gets replaced. Sterling work and it looks to be going in very much the right direction :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as the guy largely responsible for the current DCMS website &#8211; having looked at your wireframes I won&#8217;t mourn my baby one bit once it gets replaced. Sterling work and it looks to be going in very much the right direction :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
